Features of the dissertation on psychology

Features of the dissertation on psychology

Scientific work can be prepared in a discipline such as psychology. The approach to writing is special and requires the fulfillment of certain requirements that are guaranteed to lead to success.

Work begins with the choice of a theme and here, it would seem, there is nothing special. However, the topic should be chosen as a narrow focus to implement a deep study. Yes, and on a narrowly specialized topic, you can more accurately pick up the literature and exercise strict control of the information that will be used in the thesis.

The dissertation on psychology must meet certain requirements:

Unity – which involves the creation of a thesis in which all parts and paragraphs will be interconnected with each other, and not to represent individual chapters in different directions.

Systematic – provides for consideration of the elements of the study as a common system, without distinction into its component parts.

Connectivity – information must relate to each other.

A feature of the thesis on psychology is to build it on the basis of data from an already conducted study. Materials must be reliable and have a scientific focus.

Speaking about the structure, the dissertation on psychology is based on the classical scheme, which presupposes the presence in the work of the introduction, the main part and the conclusions of the research results. Of course, each of the parts must comply with its purpose and content.

In the introduction, the purpose of the study is formulated, the tasks are defined, the practical significance is characterized, and the relevance of the topic is described.

The main part may consist of several sections in which the description of the conducted research and the results obtained are carried out.

The conclusion includes the summarized work, recommendations.

Considering that the dissertation is a scientific work, it is necessary to prepare for it thoroughly. In order for the content to correspond to the topic, it is necessary to perform a monotonous work on drawing up a dissertation plan, especially since it must still be approved by its supervisor. Drawing up a plan can take a lot of time since it requires a detailed study of the literature and the selection of information that will be used in the thesis. There is no need to type too much material, you still will not be able to put it into work in full. Therefore, the best option would be to work hard on each item of the dissertation.

Requirements for dissertation registration in APA style

The titles of articles, monographs, and journals in English should be transliterated in Latin and translated into English. For example, Ilyin M.V. Stabilization of development // Megatrends of world development. M., 2001. P. 183-191 (description in the “List of references” according to State Standard). Transliteration can be done automatically using translit.ru, the transliteration mode should be chosen LC (Library of Congress). When referring to translated literature in References, the original edition should be indicated.

In the text of your work, references serve as a brief reference to the full bibliographic description of the work given in the list of references. Usually, the link is placed in the text of your work. If the link becomes cumbersome (in the case of several works, or if the link is accompanied by additional explanations), it may be placed in a footnote. If you indicate the source as such, without quoting or implying a specific place from it, then in parentheses it is enough to indicate the author’s name and year of publication of the work: (Arendt, 2012) or (Marchart, 2010).

If several texts are indicated, references to them are separated by a semicolon (Arendt, 2012; Marchart, 2010).

If you quote or refer to a specific place in the work, then the link also indicates the corresponding page (s) of work, for example:

(Arendt, 2012, 56) or (Marchart, 2010, 23-24).

The references to historical texts for correct orientation in chronology are used to indicate the dating of the first publication of the work (reading the report or completing the manuscript). In this case, along with the year of publication of the publication that is cited in your text, the year of the first publication of the work, reading the report, etc. is indicated in square brackets.

For example: (Husserl, 2009 [1911]).

At the same time, an explanation regarding the citation rule is given in the reference on the first case of a similar citation.

An example of a clarifying reference: (Husserl, 2012 [1911], 243. – Here and hereafter, the year of the first publication of the work is indicated in square brackets)

An example of bibliographic description, in this case, is in the section below in the section “Examples of references to the text published in a multi-volume edition).

NB! The need for this kind of design can be clarified with the supervisor.

Continue Reading

Thesis versus dissertation

Thesis versus dissertation

Today, a huge number of critics and those who want to express their thesis versus dissertation, and others to listen to him. A review of a book, a sample of which can be found in any textbook, is actually not as simple as it might seem. Therefore, not every writer, reader or journalist has sufficient analytical mind and critical eye to optimally and correctly write unbiased reviews.

About how to write a correct thesis versus dissertation of the book can not be read or learned, because many critics just received a good philological education, which allows you to determine the grade and quality of the work. A bad review is primarily distinguished by the dominance of one’s own opinion, the definitions are bad and a good book, little argumentation and lack of critical view, accurate conclusions. At the same time, the text is more like a school essay or a review of a book told to a friend.

A low-quality review will not be a worthy response to the book, and therefore critics should be aware of the full responsibility for their feedback. Before you write a review of the book, it is worth considering all the criteria of a quality work, but only the last point to indicate your attitude and perception of the book.

Experienced critics can say a lot about the work from the first pages of the book, but the inexperienced will have to read the text completely. However, ideally the critic is obliged to read the text carefully and fully, so that the conclusions are as reasoned and accurate as possible. A review of a good book, a sample of which can be found in classical works, where the best minds of modern times wrote their reviews, and later editors to add them to the contents of the book.

A review is a review, which means responsibility for the spoken word. Thus, the review should take into account the maximum of criteria, and the most important is the plot, its quality, the number of characters and the role of disclosure of characters, the relevance of the subject, the uniqueness of the canvas of the work. The other criteria depend more on the genre of the work, because it is not worthwhile to review the love story with the criteria of characters or the complexity of the plot. Particular prejudice and a large number of reviews are caused by works of famous contemporaries, who position themselves as confident authors of quality books. As a rule, there are always two camps: opponents or admirers of similar books or authors. A striking example is Paulo Coelho or Janusz Wisniewski, as well as many contemporary authors who continue to write under the flurry of real-time criticism.

Continue Reading

Informative essay outline

Informative essay outline

  The informative essay outline is a genre of literary term paper definition, a newspaper and magazine publication, but at the same time it is rightly considered a genre of bibliography (it originated from the bibliographical description of the book). Usually the term paper definition concludes with a bibliographic description of the book, information on its content, composition, problems raised in it. It is characterized by a small volume and brevity. The reviewer deals primarily with novelties, about which practically no one has written, about which a certain opinion has not yet taken shape. In the classics, the reviewer discovers, first of all, the possibility of its actual, cutting-edge reading. Any work should be considered in the context of modern life and the modern literary process: to evaluate it precisely as a new phenomenon. This topicality is an indispensable sign of a review

Main types of informative essay outline are conventionally distinguished:

a small critical or journalistic article (often polemical in nature) in which the work in question is an occasion for discussing topical public or literary problems;

 essay; its more lyrical reflection of the author of the review, inspired by the reading of the work than its interpretation;

A detailed in which the content of the work, the features of the composition, the polygraphic performance, the skill of the illustrator are disclosed and at the same time his assessment is made (often in the selection of the material);

Autoreview, which describes the author’s view of his work.

Examination review (as I understand the review on the school exam) – a detailed abstract. An approximate plan for reviewing the literary work. Bibliographic description of the work (author, title, publisher, year of release) and a brief (in one or two sentences) retelling its content. Immediate response to the work of literature (recall-impression). Critical analysis or complex analysis of the text: the meaning of the title – an analysis of its form and content – features of the composition – the skill of the he  in depicting heroes – the individual style of the writer. Argumented evaluation of the work and personal reflections of the author of the review: the main idea of ​​the review is the relevance of the. In the review is not necessarily the presence of all of the above components, most importantly.

Continue Reading

Term paper definition

Term paper definition

  The review is a genre of literary term paper definition, a newspaper and magazine publication, but at the same time it is rightly considered a genre of bibliography (it originated from the bibliographical description of the book). Usually the term paper definition concludes with a bibliographic description of the book, information on its content, composition, problems raised in it. It is characterized by a small volume and brevity. The reviewer deals primarily with novelties, about which practically no one has written, about which a certain opinion has not yet taken shape. In the classics, the reviewer discovers, first of all, the possibility of its actual, cutting-edge reading. Any work should be considered in the context of modern life and the modern literary process: to evaluate it precisely as a new phenomenon. This topicality is an indispensable sign of a review

Main types of reviews are conventionally distinguished:

a small critical or journalistic article (often polemical in nature) in which the work in question is an occasion for discussing topical public or literary problems;

 essay; its more lyrical reflection of the author of the review, inspired by the reading of the work than its interpretation;

A detailed annotation in which the content of the work, the features of the composition, the polygraphic performance, the skill of the illustrator are disclosed and at the same time his assessment is made (often in the selection of the material);

Autoreview, which describes the author’s view of his work.

Examination review (as I understand the review on the school exam) – a detailed abstract. An approximate plan for reviewing the literary work. Bibliographic description of the work (author, title, publisher, year of release) and a brief (in one or two sentences) retelling its content. Immediate response to the work of literature (recall-impression). Critical analysis or complex analysis of the text: the meaning of the title – an analysis of its form and content – features of the composition – the skill of the author in depicting heroes – the individual style of the writer. Argumented evaluation of the work and personal reflections of the author of the review: the main idea of ​​the review is the relevance of the subject matter of the work. In the review is not necessarily the presence of all of the above components, most importantly, that the review was interesting and competent.

Continue Reading

MLA term paper format

MLA term paper format

An important genre in modern journalism is the review articles, which are understood as compiling several articles on the chosen topic. The peculiarity is the neutral style of the author and the lack of vivid means of expressiveness, although it is the critical review of this or that article that will make it interesting for readers.

It is worth to find an interesting topic for readers, that is, it can be political problems, economic or description of events from the world of sports, because the main thing is to create a complete picture for the readers of what is happening MLA term paper format. Therefore, it is worth using not only domestic sources, but also in foreign languages: this is the only way to get the full picture. Never be afraid to resort to the use of historical, artistic and journalistic literature, for example, to create an article lead, because this will give the article not only modern relevance, but historical as well.

It is important to build information logically and to the maximum extent structured, for example, by breaking articles by dividing them into Western and domestic sources, or from independent journalists and news agencies, and so on. This will help the reader to understand the problem discussed in the article within the shortest possible time.

We need to select good pictures that will dilute your text with a new kind of information, which will only attract readers. It should also be noted that in the review articles the narrative style should be as objective and pragmatic as possible, that is, without using excessive metaphors and epithets, except in the headings and subtitles of the article.

Do not forget about your own conclusions at the end of the article, after all, this article can be called yours. This is the place for your creativity that will show your talent as a journalist.

Always remember the classical structure of any MLA term paper format: 1. Introduction, which reveals the relevance of the problem. 2. The main part, that is, an overview of the articles. 3. Additional information. 4. Conclusion, that is, a critical commentary of the author of the review article.

While writing a review, remember that there must necessarily be a recommendation on behalf of a reviewer for publication in a scientific journal. In the review it is necessary to indicate the data on the reviewer himself – his name, academic title, academic degree, place of work, position, as well as signature and seal.

Continue Reading